<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Adam Caudill's Blog</title>
	<link>http://adamcaudill.com</link>
	<description>Adam's view on technology, software development, and world domination.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Switching to Gmail, Again by Chris</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/10/09/switching-to-gmail-again/#comment-8033</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/10/09/switching-to-gmail-again/#comment-8033</guid>
		<description>You can save all that money by using gmail's IMAP function. Just set up a gmail IMAP account on your email client (I used thunderbird, but I can't see why it wouldn't work with outlook &#38; co) and copy/move your email folder from the local folders to the imap folders on gmail. Preserves timestamps and even other things like 'stars' and 'replied' flags. No conversion of storage formats between different clients necessary.
The folder names you use will even appear in gmail as labels thus further reducing the migration workload. Just be aware that the string length of labels is limited and subfolders will be converted to labels in the parentfolder/subfolder format, ie becomming quite long. Gmail will not execute imap commands that attempt to create such folders.

Another thing worth mentioning is probably that you are mistaken if you think that the 'sender' issue is solved by using the google apps version of gmail. If you ever set up additional email addresses in one account (in the same way you did in the 'other' gmail) the 'sender' header will again be added with your account address in it.
This a bit less annoying than the original issue (since it is a email@yourdomain.com rather than ...@gmail.com address) but still a sucker. I, for example, free lance for a number of different companies and pool all the work related email from all of them in my google apps account, say, jobs@mydomain.com Now these companies expect me to use their corporate email addresses to send email related to their projects and I wish I could send emails without letting anybody too obviously know that I am using a jobs@mydomain.com account to send it. Especially since obviously quite a number of people send email back to that account and not the corporate address there's supposed to use. Annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can save all that money by using gmail&#8217;s IMAP function. Just set up a gmail IMAP account on your email client (I used thunderbird, but I can&#8217;t see why it wouldn&#8217;t work with outlook &amp; co) and copy/move your email folder from the local folders to the imap folders on gmail. Preserves timestamps and even other things like &#8217;stars&#8217; and &#8216;replied&#8217; flags. No conversion of storage formats between different clients necessary.<br />
The folder names you use will even appear in gmail as labels thus further reducing the migration workload. Just be aware that the string length of labels is limited and subfolders will be converted to labels in the parentfolder/subfolder format, ie becomming quite long. Gmail will not execute imap commands that attempt to create such folders.</p>
<p>Another thing worth mentioning is probably that you are mistaken if you think that the &#8217;sender&#8217; issue is solved by using the google apps version of gmail. If you ever set up additional email addresses in one account (in the same way you did in the &#8216;other&#8217; gmail) the &#8217;sender&#8217; header will again be added with your account address in it.<br />
This a bit less annoying than the original issue (since it is a <a href="mailto:email@yourdomain.com">email@yourdomain.com</a> rather than <a href="mailto:...@gmail.com">&#8230;@gmail.com</a> address) but still a sucker. I, for example, free lance for a number of different companies and pool all the work related email from all of them in my google apps account, say, <a href="mailto:jobs@mydomain.com">jobs@mydomain.com</a> Now these companies expect me to use their corporate email addresses to send email related to their projects and I wish I could send emails without letting anybody too obviously know that I am using a <a href="mailto:jobs@mydomain.com">jobs@mydomain.com</a> account to send it. Especially since obviously quite a number of people send email back to that account and not the corporate address there&#8217;s supposed to use. Annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Switching to Gmail, Again by Gabe</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/10/09/switching-to-gmail-again/#comment-7898</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/10/09/switching-to-gmail-again/#comment-7898</guid>
		<description>Can't you just setup gmail as an IMAP account in outlook and then drag your old mail into a gmail folder - which will also preserve time stamps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t you just setup gmail as an IMAP account in outlook and then drag your old mail into a gmail folder - which will also preserve time stamps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Outlook, to Gmail, to The Bat! by "Switching to Gmail, Again" by Adam Caudill&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/06/from-outlook-to-gmail-to-the-bat/#comment-5520</link>
		<dc:creator>"Switching to Gmail, Again" by Adam Caudill&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/06/from-outlook-to-gmail-to-the-bat/#comment-5520</guid>
		<description>[...] again, I&#8217;ve decided to switch email clients; this time from The Bat to Gmail, or more specifically, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] again, I&#8217;ve decided to switch email clients; this time from The Bat to Gmail, or more specifically, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Task Management with Tasks by "Well, looks like I was wrong&#8230;" by Adam Caudill&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/01/21/task-management-with-tasks/#comment-4424</link>
		<dc:creator>"Well, looks like I was wrong&#8230;" by Adam Caudill&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/01/21/task-management-with-tasks/#comment-4424</guid>
		<description>[...] been using Tasks (which I highly recommend) for awhile now to keep track of what I&#8217;m working on, and for that it is quite effective. For [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] been using Tasks (which I highly recommend) for awhile now to keep track of what I&#8217;m working on, and for that it is quite effective. For [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Love My Job by Adam</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/10/i-love-my-job/#comment-1471</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/10/i-love-my-job/#comment-1471</guid>
		<description>This is the point that I wish I had a clever answer, complete with an impressive system for dealing with these issues. But, I can't, because I don't have a clever answer.

I'm a bit of a workaholic, so that tends to lead to painfully long hours on whatever I'm working on. I try to keep my hours at work in the 40-50 range, but in the last few weeks, I've been working 12 hours a day, 6 days a week.

I've found myself taking the role of a project manager more often recently, so I do certainly understand the forces at work. The unfortunate thing is that I don't have the authority to implement many of the suggestions I made in this article.

There has to be a balance, where a developer can be productive, but still have a life; and management can see the progress they need. I just wish more managers would look for that balance, instead of looking for ways to push their developers harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the point that I wish I had a clever answer, complete with an impressive system for dealing with these issues. But, I can&#8217;t, because I don&#8217;t have a clever answer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit of a workaholic, so that tends to lead to painfully long hours on whatever I&#8217;m working on. I try to keep my hours at work in the 40-50 range, but in the last few weeks, I&#8217;ve been working 12 hours a day, 6 days a week.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found myself taking the role of a project manager more often recently, so I do certainly understand the forces at work. The unfortunate thing is that I don&#8217;t have the authority to implement many of the suggestions I made in this article.</p>
<p>There has to be a balance, where a developer can be productive, but still have a life; and management can see the progress they need. I just wish more managers would look for that balance, instead of looking for ways to push their developers harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not a good idea&#8230; by "So Ends The River of Schwag" by Adam Caudill&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2006/10/05/not-not-a-good-idea/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>"So Ends The River of Schwag" by Adam Caudill&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2006/10/05/not-not-a-good-idea/#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>[...] six months ago, I predicted the end of the Valleyschwag project, that prediction recently came to pass. The Valleyscwag team recently [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] six months ago, I predicted the end of the Valleyschwag project, that prediction recently came to pass. The Valleyscwag team recently [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Love My Job by Alistair</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/10/i-love-my-job/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/10/i-love-my-job/#comment-981</guid>
		<description>Adam,

I have long thought about this problem, discussed it with many other developers. 

Regarding your point about the hours worked, after hearing various co-workers and friends gripe/complain/bitch about it, the only way to make it stop - is to &lt;strong&gt;stop doing the hours&lt;/strong&gt;. 

As you rightly pointed out, why pay for two people when you can ride one for all its worth. I'm not suggesting that you don't put in a good effort; I don't honestly think there would be many software developers around that do a 38 hour week. So while it is essentially &lt;em&gt;expected&lt;/em&gt; that a software developer do more than the required hours, there has to be some limits put on it - you don't and shouldn't be doing more than 50 hours per week all the time in my opinion.

As you pointed out, when the time comes to put in the effort and hours as a major project comes to an end - by all means, bust your arse. However, when that isn't the case, I don't think it is fair of the employer to expect that volume of an employees time back to back - everyone is meant to have a life outside of the work environment.

While this all sounds good in theory, its actually quite difficult in practice and I'm still working on keeping my hours inside what I'd consider reasonable when we're not pushing hard for something.

How do you handle this particular problem?

Al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>I have long thought about this problem, discussed it with many other developers. </p>
<p>Regarding your point about the hours worked, after hearing various co-workers and friends gripe/complain/bitch about it, the only way to make it stop - is to <strong>stop doing the hours</strong>. </p>
<p>As you rightly pointed out, why pay for two people when you can ride one for all its worth. I&#8217;m not suggesting that you don&#8217;t put in a good effort; I don&#8217;t honestly think there would be many software developers around that do a 38 hour week. So while it is essentially <em>expected</em> that a software developer do more than the required hours, there has to be some limits put on it - you don&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t be doing more than 50 hours per week all the time in my opinion.</p>
<p>As you pointed out, when the time comes to put in the effort and hours as a major project comes to an end - by all means, bust your arse. However, when that isn&#8217;t the case, I don&#8217;t think it is fair of the employer to expect that volume of an employees time back to back - everyone is meant to have a life outside of the work environment.</p>
<p>While this all sounds good in theory, its actually quite difficult in practice and I&#8217;m still working on keeping my hours inside what I&#8217;d consider reasonable when we&#8217;re not pushing hard for something.</p>
<p>How do you handle this particular problem?</p>
<p>Al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Vista User Experience Guidelines by Adam</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/03/01/windows-vista-user-experience-guidelines/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 00:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/03/01/windows-vista-user-experience-guidelines/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>Update: I've corrected a couple typo's. Thanks Laura :) (Writing without adequate sleep is a bad thing at times.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: I&#8217;ve corrected a couple typo&#8217;s. Thanks Laura <img src='http://adamcaudill.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> (Writing without adequate sleep is a bad thing at times.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Outlook, to Gmail, to The Bat! by Adam</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/06/from-outlook-to-gmail-to-the-bat/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/06/from-outlook-to-gmail-to-the-bat/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>@Pascal,

I missed that, I wish I had noticed that sooner. I'll probably be sticking with The Bat for awhile, but I will have to play around with that and see if there are any other similar gotcha's.

@Jordan,

Indeed, while it's not really Google's problem to deal with a 'feature' of another (competing) product; to me it seems that they could greatly increase the value of the product by making that single, small change. 

In general I love anything Google releases, and I've found Gmail to be the best (by far) web-based email client available; but that one feature, and the lack of interest (or even a useful response) on the topic from Google makes me want to shy away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pascal,</p>
<p>I missed that, I wish I had noticed that sooner. I&#8217;ll probably be sticking with The Bat for awhile, but I will have to play around with that and see if there are any other similar gotcha&#8217;s.</p>
<p>@Jordan,</p>
<p>Indeed, while it&#8217;s not really Google&#8217;s problem to deal with a &#8216;feature&#8217; of another (competing) product; to me it seems that they could greatly increase the value of the product by making that single, small change. </p>
<p>In general I love anything Google releases, and I&#8217;ve found Gmail to be the best (by far) web-based email client available; but that one feature, and the lack of interest (or even a useful response) on the topic from Google makes me want to shy away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Outlook, to Gmail, to The Bat! by Jordan</title>
		<link>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/06/from-outlook-to-gmail-to-the-bat/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamcaudill.com/2007/02/06/from-outlook-to-gmail-to-the-bat/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>If they used the "X-Sender" header instead of "Sender" (as Fastmail.fm does), there would be no "On behalf of" issue in Outlook. It's the one feature stopping me from using Gmail full time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they used the &#8220;X-Sender&#8221; header instead of &#8220;Sender&#8221; (as Fastmail.fm does), there would be no &#8220;On behalf of&#8221; issue in Outlook. It&#8217;s the one feature stopping me from using Gmail full time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
